Delta's New Game Plan: Focusing on Just 2 West Coast Hubs

So, I was reading about Delta's big move on the Pacific front, and it's kinda wild. They're basically scrapping their multi-hub strategy for flights across the Pacific and putting all their eggs in just two baskets - or airports, I guess - on the West Coast. I think it's LAX and SEA if I'm not mistaken.

They're facing a $4 billion revenue gap, which is a massive hole to fill. It seems like they're going all-in on these two spots to streamline operations and cut costs. Honestly, it sounds risky to me. What if one of those airports hits a snag or there's some unexpected issue?

I get that concentrating on fewer hubs might boost efficiency and maybe even improve service, but I'm curious if this could backfire in terms of flexibility. Like, what if demand shifts or something?

Anyway, I'd love to know what you guys think. Is this a smart move by Delta or a bit of a gamble? And do you think other airlines might follow suit, or is this just a Delta thing? Let me know your thoughts!

Feels like a big gamble. LAX and SEA are huge, but what if something disrupts one of them? Like bad weather or a major event. They might end up scrambling to reroute flights. Plus, if demand shifts to another area, they could be stuck. I guess it could lead to better service with more focus, but it seems like a lot of eggs in just two baskets. Wonder if they'll eventually regret not keeping a third option open.

I dunno, focusing just on LAX and SEA seems like a double-edged sword. Sure, it might streamline things and save money, but what about all the traffic from SFO or even PDX? Those places have their own demand and could be left hanging. Plus, with all the climate stuff going on, SEA's been getting some unpredictable weather. Could be asking for trouble if everything's funneled through there. Wonder if they have a solid backup plan for potential hiccups.